Indian stock market reaction to international cross-listing： Evidence from Depository Receipts

The present study investigates the impact of cross listing of ADRs on the Indian stock market for the period June 2004 to July 2009. Average abnormal returns and cumulative average abnormal returns are calculated for the [-25, ＋25] event window, with the ADR listing date being the event date. The result indicates a significant negative abnormal local market return on the ADR listing day. Six out of nine companies shows increased volatility of local returns after the cross listing. We can conclude that ADR listings have no tangible benefit impact to the local shareholders.     

ADVERSE SELECTION,SPREAD BEHAVIOR,AND OVER-THE-COUNTER SEASONED EQUITY OFFERINGS

In this paper the effects of over-the-counter seasoned equity issuances on the percentage bid-ask spreads around announcement and offer dates are examined. A declining spread in the pre-announcement period suggests that resolution of information asymmetry begins well before the announcement date. Further, using issue size as a proxy for the extent of information asymmetry, we observe that spreads for larger issues reach “normal” levels before the first public disclosure of the offering. For smaller issues this occurs only on the offer date. Results are consistent with the dealer experiencing reduced adverse information risk as a result of information-gathering efforts during the underwriting process.     

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN OTC BID-ASK SPREADS AND DEALER SIZE: THE IMPACT OF ORDER-PROCESSING AND DIVERSIFICATION COSTS

The effects of large transactions on OTC security dealers' bid-ask spreads are analyzed for stocks with different price levels. Because overhead expenses vary little with the value of transactions, economies of scale exist for dealers in higher-priced stocks. Thus, percentage bid-ask spreads decline with the price level of the stock. However, larger transactions entail larger order-clearing and inventory-adjustment costs. These costs may be particularly burdensome for smaller dealers with limited purchasing powers and abilities to diversify inexpensively. Consequently, smaller dealers charge higher spreads for trading high-priced stocks.